Pay deal rejection sparks A-League uncertainty

George Clarke |

The A-Leagues face an uncertain future after player wage negotiations broke down.
The A-Leagues face an uncertain future after player wage negotiations broke down.

Socceroos and Matildas contracted to A-Leagues clubs could soon exercise their right to industrial action after the football players’ union rejected the latest pay deal proposed by league bosses.

The previous collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the A-League Men and A-League Women players and the Australian Professional Leagues (APL) expired on June 30.

And despite the agreement lapsing last month, the players’ union, Professional Footballers Australia (PFA), and the APL were confident a deal would get over the line in the early part of July after beginning talks late last year. 

But the latest proposal was unanimously rejected by players at a meeting last week, plunging the leagues’ outlook into uncertainty. 

“The result of the vote was clear – an overwhelming majority of players elected to reject the APL proposal, believing that it did not advance the players’ and the game’s collective interests,” PFA chief executive Beau Busch wrote in a memo sent to players, and seen by AAP.

“The A-Leagues delegates have now formally ratified this position. As such, we have informed APL that their proposal has been rejected and that the CBA negotiation process has been exhausted.”

Beau Busch.
Beau Busch: ‘The CBA negotiation process has been exhausted.’ (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

The outcome means Australia’s top-flight football leagues are the only major competitions in the country without a CBA.

Players were prohibited from taking industrial action under the CBA, but with no agreement currently in place the competition is potentially entering uncharted territory. 

Relations between the PFA and the APL have been frosty for the best part of a year since APL chair Stephen Conroy signalled his intention to introduce a hard salary cap of $3million.

The APL has since shifted its position under new chief executive Steve Rosich and offered players a voice at the table to shape the leagues’ direction.

Mackenzie Anthony in action.
The pay impasse comes with the A-Leagues set to announce their new fixture lists this week. (Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS)

But that wasn’t enough to swing players to vote for last week’s proposal.

The offer, that was rejected by PFA members, included a $100,000 increase to the $2.6million ALM salary cap and the limiting of marquee contracts – the value of which sits outside the cap – to just one per club.

The APL also wanted to introduce a $775,000 salary cap for the ALW, while boosting the minimum wage of female players by 27 per cent to close to $35,000 per season. 

Rosich said the APL would consider its next steps over the coming weeks, with fixtures for the 2026-27 season expected to be released later this week. 

Steve Rosich.
Steve Rosich says the APL will consider next steps over the pay deal in the coming weeks. (David Crosling/AAP PHOTOS)

“We have been negotiating in good faith with the PFA for the past eight months to agree a new CBA to ensure the sustainable growth of the A-Leagues for our clubs and players, and are looking to continue to do so,” Rosich said in a statement. 

“We have had collaborative discussions through to Wednesday, and we have sought an explanation on the PFA’s position, before further engagement.” 

The PFA declined to comment.

AAP