He’s a national joke, most hated man: Lehrmann lawyer
Adelaide Lang |
Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann is fighting to quash a finding he likely raped colleague Brittany Higgins, which led him to become “probably Australia’s most hated man”.
The former federal political staffer is appealing his defamation loss against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project in 2021.
Justice Michael Lee found Ms Higgins’ claims she had been raped in parliament house in 2019 were substantially true in a ruling against Lehrmann in April 2024.
But Lehrmann, 29, claims the judgment was rife with errors which will be ventilated during a three-day appeal hearing that began on Wednesday.
He arrived at the Sydney courthouse more than an hour before the hearing, wearing his trademark rectangular glasses and navy suit, carrying a brown briefcase.
His lawyer Zali Burrows told the panel of judges that Justice Lee’s serious ruling meant Lehrmann probably became “the most damaged man in Australia”.
Media attention, aggravated by commentary from Channel Ten and Wilkinson, had led to a flood of hateful social media comments aimed at Lehrmann, she said.
“He’s pretty much become a national joke,” Ms Burrows said.
“He’s probably Australia’s most hated man.”
The ex-Liberal staffer alleges he was denied procedural fairness because the events found by the judge were “starkly different” from the case run by Ten.
“The primary judge found that the rape occurred in a particular way that wasn’t put to Mr Lehrmann in evidence and he was taken by surprise as to the nature of the rape,” Ms Burrows said.
Lehrmann was accused of committing a violent rape but Justice Lee found it was a “non-violent” rape.
“I’m not sure that’s a concept I understand,” Justice Craig Colvin said when questioning whether that had been the finding.
Ms Burrows noted the judge had not been satisfied about a number of the violent elements argued by Ten, including that Lehrmann had held open Ms Higgins’ legs or pinned her to the sofa.
She said there had been “a really unfair denial of natural justice” because her client was not questioned on the details of rape found by the judge on the balance of probabilities.
But Justice Michael Wigney noted Lehrmann had denied the sexual intercourse took place, so quizzing him on additional factors would have been fruitless.
“This is not a different case. This is a case where much of what was identified was found,” he said.
The trial judge found Lehrmann had been so “hell-bent” on having sex with Ms Higgins that he was reckless as to whether or not she was consenting.
But Justice Lee’s definition of rape has been criticised by Lehrmann, who claims it is inconsistent with the meaning conveyed to an ordinary person.
Ms Burrows asked the court to reassess the finding that Lehrmann would only be entitled to $20,000 in damages, if he was found to be defamed.
She said it was inadequate and a much higher figure was needed to address the reputational damage of the very serious imputations of what she has dubbed a false charge of rape.
Lehrmann continues to deny he sexually assaulted Ms Higgins and a criminal case in 2022 was abandoned without any findings against him.
“Having escaped the lions’ den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of going back for his hat,” Justice Lee said in his decision in 2024.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
AAP
